How does Charlie Munger differentiate between 'multiple mental models' and 'interdisciplinary knowledge'?

Here is the translation:

Good, here is the response you requested.

---

Charlie Munger's distinction between "Multiple Mental Models" and "Interdisciplinary Knowledge" can be succinctly summarized as: "Interdisciplinary Knowledge" is the "raw material" for building the edifice of wisdom, while "Multiple Mental Models" are the "blueprint and toolbox" for thinking, analyzing, and making decisions using that material.

They are closely interconnected and build upon each other, rather than being independent concepts. Specifically, their differences manifest in the following aspects:

1. Interdisciplinary Knowledge: The "Input" and "Foundation" of Wisdom (The "What")

Interdisciplinary knowledge is the bedrock of Munger's thinking system. It refers to absorbing the most core, fundamental, and universal theories and concepts from various important disciplines.

• Essence: Breadth and depth of knowledge. It is a collection of facts, theories, and concepts.
• Sources: Hard and soft sciences like physics, biology, psychology, economics, history, mathematics. Munger emphasizes that you don't need to be an expert in every field, but you must master the most essential "Big Ideas" from each.
• Purpose: To avoid the "man with a hammer" tendency (To a man with a hammer, everything looks like a nail). When you only possess knowledge from a single domain, your perspective becomes extremely narrow, making you prone to solving all problems in a fixed, inappropriate way. Only with interdisciplinary knowledge can you see the full picture of the world.
• Analogy: If your mind is a kitchen, then interdisciplinary knowledge is the top-tier ingredients you've sourced from around the world – "Newton's Laws" from physics, "Evolution" from biology, "Cognitive Biases" from psychology, and "Opportunity Cost" from economics.

In short, interdisciplinary knowledge is "what you know."

2. Multiple Mental Models: The "Processing" and "Application" of Wisdom (The "How")

Multiple mental models are the crucial step in transforming interdisciplinary knowledge into practical wisdom. They are not the knowledge itself, but rather the thinking frameworks or mental patterns distilled from this knowledge for analyzing and solving problems.

• Essence: Frameworks and tools for thinking. It is the methodology for organizing knowledge and putting it into practice.
• Core Concept: The "Latticework of Models." Munger believes these models should not exist in isolation but should interconnect and interact like a crisscrossing lattice. When faced with a problem, you can examine it from the perspective of different models, gaining a more three-dimensional and truer understanding.
• Purpose: To make wiser decisions. By applying multiple models, you can avoid the blind spots of a single perspective, check for flaws in your thinking, and validate the feasibility of an idea from multiple dimensions.
• Analogy: You not only have a kitchen full of top-tier ingredients (interdisciplinary knowledge), more importantly, you are a chef who has mastered various cooking techniques (mental models). Faced with a piece of beef, you could choose French slow cooking (applying the "Compound Interest Model" to think long-term), Japanese teppanyaki (using the "Tipping Point Model" to analyze sudden change), or Chinese stir-fry (employing the "Feedback Loop Model" to observe rapid changes). Ultimately, you present a "delicious dish" (a wise decision) resulting from careful deliberation.

In short, multiple mental models are "how you use what you know to think."

Core Differences Summary Table

Conclusion

For Charlie Munger, merely possessing "interdisciplinary knowledge" is far from sufficient. Someone who is well-read but cannot apply their knowledge is merely a "walking library" and will still make mistakes in decision-making.

True wisdom lies in: First, building a rich repository of "interdisciplinary knowledge" through broad learning; then, refining and internalizing this knowledge into an interconnected "latticework" of "multiple mental models"; finally, when confronting complex problems in the real world, being able to skillfully deploy this "model toolbox" to conduct systematic analysis from different angles.

Therefore, the progression from "interdisciplinary knowledge" to "multiple mental models" represents a qualitative leap from "Knowing" to "Understanding & Applying". This is the core path to the "worldly wisdom" advocated by Munger.