Is Graham's Value Investing Philosophy Still Effective in the High-Tech and Internet Era?
Great question! This is a classic dilemma that almost everyone encounters when learning about value investing. Having played the investment game for many years, I've pondered this deeply myself. Let me share my perspective on this.
In short: The "soul" (core principles) of Benjamin Graham's investment philosophy remains highly relevant, perhaps even timeless. However, the "tools" (specific methods) he used need modern updating.
Breaking it down makes it much clearer.
I. Why its "Soul" Remains Powerful
Grahaman value investing rests on two foundational pillars. Ask yourself—are these still fundamental truths today?
-
Mr. Market
- Graham said: The market is like an emotionally unstable business partner. Every day, he offers you a price to either buy your shares or sell you his. Sometimes he's wildly optimistic and quotes ridiculously high prices; other times he's deeply pessimistic and quotes absurdly low prices.
- My take: Isn't this exactly today’s stock market? Look at tech stocks: soaring 10% one day, only to plunge 20% a couple of days later on mediocre earnings news. Market volatility might even be greater now. Graham reminds us that you don't need to dance to Mr. Market's tune daily—instead, exploit his mood swings. Buy when he’s panicked and offers bargain prices; sell to him when he’s euphoric and prices are sky-high. This core idea is timeless.
-
Margin of Safety
- Graham said: The secret to investing is to buy $1 worth of value for $0.50. The price you pay must be significantly lower than your estimate of intrinsic value. This difference is your "Margin of Safety," a buffer protecting you from major errors.
- My take: This is the essence of risk control in investing. Whether buying an old-economy steel mill or a cutting-edge AI company, shouldn't you feel safer buying at a discount? If you think a company is worth $100, it's best to buy when it dips to $60 or $70. Even if your valuation is off and it's only worth $80, you haven't lost money. This principle of "building in a margin for error" is the bedrock of long-term investment success. The bursting of the dot-com bubble and the downfall of countless tech "darlings" repeatedly prove how dangerous investing without a margin of safety can be.
Key Takeaway: Core principles like "viewing stocks as ownership in a business," "exploiting market volatility instead of predicting it," and "margin of safety being paramount"—these brilliantly insightful ideas address human nature and business fundamentals, making them as relevant today as ever.
II. Why its "Tools" Need Updating?
This is where the confusion lies. Graham's specific methods for finding undervalued stocks do struggle when applied to today's tech/Internet-dominated world.
- Graham's "Old Tools": Operating in the industrial age, he favored companies with clear balance sheets laden with "hard assets" like plants, equipment, and inventory. His classic "cigar-butt" strategy involved hunting for stocks trading below their net current assets (current assets minus total liabilities). Essentially, buying companies where the cash, inventory, etc., you'd get from liquidating them surpassed the market cap. This worked reasonably well then.
- Today's Tech Company Characteristics:
- Asset-Light: What are the most valuable assets for companies like Microsoft, Google, or Tencent? Not offices or servers, but code, patents, brands, user network effects, and data. These "intangible assets" are poorly represented or severely undervalued on financial statements. Applying Graham's old metrics to their balance sheets makes them seem "worthless."
- High Growth & Winner-Takes-Most: Technology evolves rapidly, making future growth central to valuation. A company burning cash today might dominate a future market and generate enormous profits. Graham, favoring firms with long, stable profit histories, would be highly skeptical of this "invest-for-future-growth" model.
- Shifting "Moats": Past economic moats often lay in scale/cost advantages (e.g., steel mills). Today's moats are more likely network effects (the more users on WeChat, the more valuable it becomes), brand power (Apple's loyalty), and technology ecosystems (iOS).
Therefore, using Graham's old "net asset counting" methods to invest in high-tech companies today is essentially "marking the boat" foolish and will likely lead you nowhere.
III. How Do Modern Value Investors Operate? (Graham Evolved)
Top value investors, like Warren Buffett (who himself evolved from Graham's "cigar-butt" approach), have significantly upgraded their toolkits. Here's how they adapt:
- Redefining "Assets": They recognize powerful brands, user networks, patents, and technology ("intangible assets") as crucial, long-lasting assets and attempt to assign them value.
- Shifting Focus from Asset Value to Earnings Power Value: Valuation now hinges less on "what a company owns today" and more on "*how much cash flow the company can generate in the future." They obsess over the depth of a company's "moat," the quality of its business model, the strength of its management, and then forecast future free cash flows, discounting them back to present value to determine intrinsic worth. This is far harder than counting assets, but aligns much better with tech company realities.
- Margin of Safety Persists, But Evolves: While the Margin of Safety principle remains vital, its application shifts. Yesterday's margin was "Price vs. Net Assets." Today's margin increasingly involves "Price vs. Future Earning Power" AND "Business Model Quality." Buying a company with an unassailable moat that competitors cannot easily challenge provides an inherent, significant margin of safety in itself.
Conclusion
So, circling back to your question: Does Graham's value investing philosophy still hold water in the era of high tech and the Internet?
My answer:
Powerfully effective! But it cannot be applied rigidly.
- Master his "Way" (Investment Philosophy): Wisdom like "Mr. Market" and "Margin of Safety" will be your anchor, keeping you rational through bull and bear markets.
- But Modernize his "Technique" (Valuation Tools): You can no longer solely hunt for "cigar butts" by staring at balance sheets. You must learn to understand tech business models, evaluate their intangibles and "moats," and focus on their future cash generation capabilities.
Think of it this way: Graham gave us the core treasure map principle: "Seek undervalued riches in overlooked places." This principle never expires. But we can't use picks and shovels from his era. Now, we need X-ray scanners and satellite mapping (modern valuation & analysis tools) to uncover the treasure buried in the new landscape.