How does Naval address the conflict between wealth and ethics?

Here's the English translation of the provided content, formatted in Markdown:

Hey, that's a fantastic question. Lots of people think about this, feeling that being rich inevitably means losing one's morality ("wei fu bu ren"). Naval Ravikant's way of thinking is fascinating. He doesn't simply say "rich people should also be moral," but fundamentally redefines the problem itself.

Personally, I think his breakdown of the issue can be summarized into the following core points, understandable to anyone:

Core Point: He believes that true wealth and high morality are inherently not conflicting.

Naval's core belief is actually this: True wealth creation and high morality are not in conflict; they are essentially compatible, even two sides of the same coin.

The perceived "conflict" often stems from our misunderstanding of "wealth." How does he explain this?

1. Distinguish between "Making Money" and "Creating Wealth"

This is the crucial point. Naval categorizes ways of obtaining money into two types:

Making Money: This can be a zero-sum game. For example, I open a casino; the money you lose is the money I gain. I buy low and sell high, pocketing the difference without creating new value. This approach easily leads to moral conflict because your gain might be built on someone else's loss.
Creating Wealth: This is a positive-sum game. Wealth is created when you build something society needs. For instance, you write great software that makes thousands of people more productive; you open a restaurant providing delicious food and a pleasant experience. Here, people pay you willingly in exchange for the value you create. You become wealthy, and simultaneously, society improves because of your creation.

You can think of it like this: Imagine a pizza. "Making Money" is figuring out how to take a slice from someone else's plate; whereas "Creating Wealth" is figuring out how to bake a bigger pizza, so everyone gets a larger piece.

Naval believes we should focus on "baking pizzas," not "stealing pizzas." When you focus on creating value, moral issues decrease significantly because you aren't exploiting anyone; you're serving them.

2. Play the "Long-Term Game," Not the "Short-Term Game"

Naval repeatedly emphasizes a concept: "Play long-term games with long-term people."

The Short-Term Game: This is a "one-off deal." Cheating once, making a quick buck, and then disappearing. Morally, this approach is obviously problematic, and your path narrows as fewer people trust you.
The Long-Term Game: This relies on reputation and trust. Every decision you make, every collaboration you engage in, builds your personal credibility. People are only willing to partner with you long-term if you are moral, trustworthy, and genuine. Good opportunities find those who play the long game reliably. The compounding effect of this is far more powerful than any quick score.

For example: A time-honored shop in a small town, consistently guaranteeing quality and fair dealing for decades. This is playing the "long-term game." Its wealth is built on generations of trust and good morals. In the internet age, your reputation spreads faster – and so does any blemish. Thus, maintaining good morals is itself the smartest business strategy.

3. The Ultimate Goal of Wealth is "Freedom," Not "Demonstration"

Many believe pursuing wealth is solely about luxury cars, expensive watches, and satisfying vanity. This pursuit easily leads people astray morally because desire is insatiable.

But Naval believes the true value of wealth lies in "freedom" – especially freedom of time.

Financial freedom means you don't have to do things you dislike or associate with people you don't like, just to make a living.
You can freely control your time to learn, create, be with family, or do things that genuinely bring you inner peace and fulfillment.

When your goal shifts from "infinite material possessions" to the "finite concept of freedom," your view of wealth changes. You no longer need unethical means to earn money beyond what you need for freedom. After gaining freedom, you have even more energy to contemplate deeper moral and existential questions.

4. Morality Itself is a "Leverage"

Naval always mentions "Leverage" when discussing wealth – like code, media, and capital.

But, high morals and a strong reputation are the ultimate leverage.

A trustworthy person attracts the best talent, the most loyal customers, and the most reliable partners. This network of trust significantly amplifies your ability and influence, making the process of creating wealth far more efficient. Immoral individuals cannot build such powerful relationship-based leverage.

To Summarize

So, how does Naval address the conflict between wealth and morality?

He doesn't "address" a pre-existing conflict; he makes this so-called "conflict" largely disappear by redefining the problem.

In his philosophy:

If you pursue wealth acquired through value creation, aiming for personal freedom, and you are playing a long-term game built on reputation, then morality is not an obstacle to your success, but its very foundation and accelerator.

What does conflict with morality is the mindset focused on "getting rich quick" through zero-sum games, shortcuts, and short-term plays. That isn't wealth creation; it's merely the transfer of money.