What are the three criteria for distinguishing between investment and speculation?

Sure, here is the translation:

This is a classic question, one that everyone looking to enter the market should understand first. This distinction primarily comes from the father of value investing, Benjamin Graham, who provided a brilliant exposition in his book The Intelligent Investor.

I'll explain these three criteria in plain language, using some real-life examples for context.

---

Three Core Criteria to Differentiate Investment from Speculation

Graham defined investment as: "An investment operation is one which, upon thorough analysis, promises safety of principal and an adequate return. Operations not meeting these requirements are speculative."

You see, this single definition contains three criteria. Let's break them down one by one.

---

Criterion One: Thorough Analysis (Are You Doing Homework or Wishful Thinking?)

This is perhaps the fundamental difference between investment and speculation.

• The Investor: Before buying something (like a stock), they act like a detective, conducting extensive research. They examine what the company does, how it makes money, its industry position, management competence, and financial health. Their decisions are based on facts and data analysis; they strive to truly understand the "business" they are buying.

  • An analogy: It's like you're thinking of investing in a noodle shop your friend opened. You'd definitely go try the noodles first, see how business is at the shop, look through the account books to understand monthly profits, rent, and labor costs. Only after determining the shop is reliable and can generate steady profits do you decide to invest.

• The Speculator: They focus more on "price" than "value." They might act on a friend's tip or seeing a stock soar recently, rushing to buy with the hope of selling it to the next person for a higher price tomorrow. They don't genuinely care what the company does; to them, it's just a flashing symbol.

  • An analogy: It's like being at an antique market, seeing a crowd bidding up a vase. You have no idea which dynasty it's from or its real value, but you figure since everyone's fighting for it, the price must keep rising. So you bid and buy it, hoping a "greater fool" will pay you even more tomorrow. Your decision is based on predicting others' future actions, not the inherent value of the object.

---

Criterion Two: Safety of Principal (Do You Want to Protect Your Capital or Get Rich Overnight?)

This criterion measures your risk awareness.

• The Investor: Prioritizes protecting their principal capital from significant loss. They seek something called a margin of safety. Simply put, it's buying a dollar's worth of something for 40 cents. For example, after analysis, they determine a company's stock is worth $10 per share. They might wait until the price drops to $6 or lower before buying. That $4 difference is their "safety cushion." Even if their analysis is slightly wrong or the market surprises them, this buffer protects them from major losses.

  • An analogy: You need to cross a bridge. The engineer tells you its maximum load capacity is 10 tons. But you and your car together only weigh 1 ton. That extra 9 tons of capacity is your margin of safety. Even if you gain a little weight or haul a bit more, you have no fear the bridge will collapse.

• The Speculator: They are captivated by the possibility of high returns and often ignore immense risks to get them. They pursue "fast money" and are willing to "take a gamble." Therefore, they often buy "hot stocks" trading at inflated prices with no fundamental support. When faced with a choice between capital safety and potential high returns, they will choose the latter without hesitation.

  • An analogy: Imagine the same bridge. The speculator drives a 9.5-ton truck onto it despite the 10-ton limit. It might get across safely, but if the road bumps or a bolt is loose, the consequences could be disastrous. They are gambling their capital, betting that the "what if" won't happen.

---

Criterion Three: Adequate Return (Are You Planting an Orchard or Buying a Lottery Ticket?)

This criterion measures your expectations for returns.

• The Investor: Pursues a "reasonable" and "adequate" return. This return doesn't need to be astonishing, but it should be relatively stable and predictable, akin to company dividends or steady increases in business value. They aim for long-term asset growth.

  • An analogy: It's like buying an orchard and nurturing it diligently with watering and fertilizing. You don't expect golden apples overnight, but you anticipate stable, substantial fruit harvests year after year. This return is based on the orchard's natural growth.

• The Speculator: Expects sudden, immense profits from short-term price swings. They don't care about dividends or even if the company is losing money, as long as the price skyrockets. Their gains depend almost entirely on market sentiment fluctuations.

  • An analogy: It's like buying a lottery ticket. You spend $2 dreaming of winning $5 million. You're chasing an extremely low-probability but high-payout event. You don't care how the lottery operates; you only care about the winning numbers.

To Summarize

Here’s a table for easier comparison:

A final thought: Speculation itself isn't inherently bad; markets need speculators for liquidity. But the greatest danger is: Thinking you're investing, while every action you take is pure speculation. This leaves you exposed to massive risks without any protective measures.

So, before making any move, ask yourself these three criteria. They'll help you see clearly what you're actually doing.