'What cannot be measured is still important' — How did Charlie Munger elaborate on this concept?

Here is the translation of the provided content into English, maintaining the original Markdown format:

---

What are Charlie Munger's views on "things that cannot be quantified are still important"?

Charlie Munger firmly believes that in investing and decision-making, many of the most critical factors cannot be precisely quantified. A deep understanding of these "soft" factors is precisely what distinguishes mediocrity from excellence. His views on this can be summarized into the following key points:

1. Criticizing Academia's "Physics Envy"

Munger frequently criticizes modern financial theory, especially attempts to describe complex human behavior with precise mathematical formulas (such as the Capital Asset Pricing Model CAPM and the β coefficient). He calls this tendency "Physics Envy" – the desire of economics and finance to possess simple, universal formulas like those in physics, leading to an over-reliance on quantitative models.

• Core Argument: The real-world business system is complex, adaptive, and full of human irrationality. Attempting to summarize all the risks of a company with a single number (like the β coefficient) is extremely dangerous and foolish. This leads to "precisely wrong" conclusions rather than "approximately right" ones.
• Munger's Supporting Quote: "To a man with a hammer, everything looks like a nail." He argues that analysts overly reliant on quantitative tools will unconsciously ignore all important information that doesn't fit into their models.

2. Qualitative Factors are the Foundation of the Moat

Munger believes that the long-term competitive advantage (the "moat") of a great business often stems from qualitative factors that are difficult to quantify.

• Specific factors include:

  • Quality and Integrity of Management: Is management rational? Does it prioritize shareholder interests? Does it possess exceptional capital allocation skills? These cannot be directly read from financial statements but are crucial to the company's long-term value.
  • Brand Power and Goodwill: How much is the "share of mind" occupied by a brand like Coca-Cola in consumers' hearts worth? This intangible brand loyalty provides immense pricing power and market resilience but cannot be precisely measured on a balance sheet.
  • Corporate Culture: For example, Costco's culture, which treats employees and customers well, creates a virtuous cycle leading to high customer loyalty and operational efficiency. This culture is a powerful competitive advantage but cannot be quantified.
  • Effective Organizational Structure and Processes: Some companies possess unique, hard-to-replicate operating systems, which are also part of their moat.

• Case Study: Munger and Buffett's investment in See's Candies perfectly illustrates this point. When they bought See's, they valued its strong brand position in the minds of California consumers and the resulting pricing power. This advantage, built on emotion and trust, could not be captured by any financial model.

3. The "Lollapalooza Effect" – The Convergence of Multiple Factors

Munger introduced the concept of the "Lollapalooza Effect," which refers to multiple factors converging and reinforcing each other in the same direction, producing extremely powerful, non-linear results.

• Core Argument: Significant success or failure is usually not caused by a single, quantifiable variable, but by the confluence of multiple factors (including psychology, sociology, business models, etc.).
• Relation to Quantification: Many of these factors are qualitative and unquantifiable. If you focus only on quantifiable variables, you will completely miss understanding the dynamics of the entire system and be unable to predict or explain the emergence of the "Lollapalooza Effect." For example, a product's success might simultaneously stem from: technological breakthrough (quantifiable), clever marketing (partially quantifiable), alignment with consumer psychology (hard to quantify), and the push of social trends (extremely hard to quantify).

4. Acknowledging Ignorance is the Beginning of Wisdom

Munger emphasizes the importance of the "Circle of Competence." An extension of this idea is that when faced with important factors that cannot be quantified, you must honestly assess whether you truly understand them.

• Core Argument: The quality of investment decisions depends not on how much you know, but on how clearly you recognize what you don't know. For those unquantifiable factors that determine a business's success or failure (like the network effect of a technology platform, complex corporate culture, etc.), if you cannot understand their intrinsic logic and durability, the best course of action is to avoid the investment.
• Conclusion: The point is not to slap a numerical label on everything, but to develop a deep, reliable understanding of the factors that truly drive value (whether quantifiable or not).

Summary

In conclusion, Charlie Munger is not opposed to quantitative analysis; he himself places immense importance on financial data. However, he strongly opposes quantification fetishism. He believes that basing decisions solely on quantifiable data is intellectual laziness and a dangerous oversimplification.

True investment wisdom lies in the ability to combine hard, quantifiable data (like earnings, assets, cash flow) with soft, unquantifiable insights (like brand, culture, management) to form a complete, three-dimensional cognitive framework. In his view, the most important factors, those that most decisively determine long-term success or failure, often lie hidden in the corners that cannot be plugged into an Excel spreadsheet.