Practical Skills

Of course, but Tarot cards might not give you a direct color answer, like "you should dye your hair green." It's more like a tool to help you explore your inner thoughts.

很有意思的问题，用“第一性原理”来思考学习时间分配，其实就是把所有别人告诉你的、或者你默认以为“应该如此”的条条框框都扔掉，回到最根本、最原始的点，然后从这些点出发，重新搭建只属于你自己的方法。 这就像盖房子，你不是去参考邻居家怎么盖（类比思维），而是从“我要一个什么样的家？家里几口人？我有什么样的生活习惯？这块地皮的地基和朝向如何？”这些最本质的需求和条件出发，来设计你的房子。

Let's put it this way, it's like learning to cook. If your learning method is to memorize recipes by rote, for example, "Scrambled Eggs with Tomatoes: two eggs, one tomato, 5 grams of salt.

Let's take an analogy. The various subjects we study, such as physics, chemistry, and economics, are like ready-made LEGO models built by others: a car, a house, a spaceship.

Okay, let's talk about this topic. Imagine it not as analyzing a company, but as playing with building blocks. We want to construct three models: "low prices," "wide selection," and "fast delivery.

Alright, let's talk about this. This is quite an interesting question. The idea of rocket recovery has been around for a long time, but why has it only been realized recently? It's because the "three ...

Good question, not understanding this can drive one crazy with anxiety. Let's talk about how to use "First Principles" to see it clearly, without any fluff.

Think of it this way: most people starting a business first look at "what sells well." For example, seeing the huge milk tea market, worth hundreds of billions a year, they think, "I'll make milk tea ...

Let's put it this way: you can think of it as two different ways of learning to cook. The first is "analogical thinking," which is how most of us operate.

Of course, and I think this is an "overwhelmingly effective" tool. When we argue, most of the time we're debating "emotions" and "opinions," rather than "facts" and "needs.

I don't think so. They are more like partners than substitutes. Let me use an analogy to help you understand: Evidence-based medicine is like "cooking by following a recipe.

This is an interesting question. If I were to give a direct answer, it would be: In sociology, there isn't a single, universally accepted "first principle" like F=ma in physics or 1+1=2 in mathematics...

In my opinion, these two are fundamentally different things, so it's not about one replacing the other. They are more like two tools with different purposes in a toolbox.

Hey there, this is an interesting question, and many people feel the same way. Let me try to explain my thoughts in plain language. To put it simply, it's like the difference between a "top student" (...

This is an interesting question, and I'll try to share my thoughts on it. Simply put, first principles thinking is like peeling an onion: you strip away layers of a problem until you reach the most co...

Of course not, these two are more like partners than interchangeable rivals. Let me give you an analogy to help you understand: Socratic questioning is like a skilled detective interrogating a case.

想让孩子学会“第一性原理”这个听起来很牛的思维方式，其实没那么玄乎。说白了，就是教他“扒开洋葱，一层一层看到最里面的核”，而不是只停留在“哦，这是个洋葱”的表面。别把它当成一个课程，把它变成一种生活习惯。 我分享几个自己觉得特别好用的方法，你可以试试： 1. 玩“打破砂锅问到底”的游戏 孩子是天生的“为什么”机器，千万别嫌烦，这是最好的机会。

This is an interesting question, and it's actually not that complicated. Let me share my perspective, hoping it helps you understand. You can imagine yourself as a relentlessly curious child, armed wi...

That's a great question! These two concepts are actually very closely related. I'll try to explain it to you in simple terms. The term "lightweighting" is easy to understand; it means finding every po...

This is an interesting question, and I'll try to explain it to you in plain language. You can imagine first principles thinking as "breaking things down to their fundamentals.