Why does Naval state that 'Rent is not wealth, but temporary cash flow'?

Here's the translation of the answer content:

Hey, that’s a great question that goes straight to the core of Naval’s view on wealth. A lot of people get confused when they hear this idea for the first time. After all, from the perspective of us ordinary folks, getting monthly rent payments seems like the very definition of "being rich," right?

To understand Naval’s point, we first need to clearly separate his definitions of "wealth" and "cash flow." Let me explain with a plain analogy to help you grasp it.

Imagine You Own an Apple Tree that Bears Fruit

Wealth: Is the apple tree itself.
Cash Flow: Is the apples the tree produces each year.

See? The difference becomes clear.

What is True Wealth?

In Naval's worldview, wealth is the asset (Asset) you own that works for you "while you sleep."

It’s the source: Like the apple tree, it’s the root that continuously generates value. No tree, no apples. For a landlord, the building itself is the wealth, not the rent.
It has long-term value: If you take good care of it, the tree can live for many years, bearing fruit annually. The building can exist for decades, even appreciate in value.
You can sell it: You can sell the entire tree to someone else whenever you want to get a large sum of money upfront. You can also sell the entire building.

So, wealth is the "goose that lays golden eggs," or the "cow that gives milk." It is the vessel of value itself. For example:

Shares of a company you own
The apartment you bought for renting out
The copyright to a bestselling book you wrote
An automated software program you developed

These things create value or have the potential for income for you, silently, whether you're working or not.

Why is Rent Just "Temporary Cash Flow"?

Rent is like the apples picked from that tree.

It’s the output, not the source: Rent "flows" from the wealth asset that is the "house." It's the result, not the cause.
It’s temporary and unstable:
- This tenant might leave next month, cutting off your cash flow.
- During an economic downturn, you might have to lower the rent to find a tenant, reducing your cash flow.
- If something goes wrong with the building (like leaks or a fire), not only do you have no cash flow, but you also have to spend money fixing it.
Once spent, it's gone: If you get 5000 bucks in rent this month and use it to pay bills or have meals, that money disappears. But the building (the wealth) is still there.

So, when Naval says rent is "temporary cash flow," he's reminding us not to confuse the incoming "flow" of income with the "stock" of wealth.

What Does This Mean for Ordinary People Like Us?

Understanding this distinction is truly essential for ordinary people. It represents a shift in mindset:

From "Chasing High Income" to "Building Assets" Many people spend their lives pursuing a high-paying job. A high salary is great, of course, but it's essentially also a form of "cash flow." You trade your time for this cash flow; once you stop working (due to illness, unemployment, retirement), this cash flow can dry up. Your time is your only asset in this scenario, and it cannot work for you while you sleep.

Naval encourages us to think: How can I turn my skills, knowledge, and money into an asset?
- Can a programmer, besides writing code for a salary (cash flow), develop a small software tool that charges users automatically (wealth)?
- Can a designer who can draw, besides taking freelance commissions (cash flow), turn their work into sellable digital prints or emoji packs (wealth)?
Distinguish Between "Consuming" and "Investing" When you receive money (like a salary or rent), you can choose to:
- Consume it: Buy the latest phone, have a lavish meal. That cash flow vanishes.
- Invest it: Use that money to acquire more "geese that lay golden eggs" — like buying shares in excellent companies, learning a new skill, or adding equipment to your small business. You're using cash flow to build more wealth.

To Sum It Up

When Naval says, "Rent isn't wealth; it's temporary cash flow," he’s using a very insightful example to tell us:

Don't just focus on the "apples" (cash flow) in front of you; strive to own the "apple tree" (wealth).

With the tree, you can continuously get apples and have the confidence that you can cash it in anytime. If you're just someone picking apples (the cash flow), your income will always be temporary and passive. This is the fundamental difference between a worker mindset (worker mentality) and an owner mindset (owner mentality).