The Impact of Blockchain and Cryptocurrencies on Future Financial Crises

兵 孟
兵 孟
Former central banker, expert in macro-prudential policy.

Alright, regarding the impact of blockchain and cryptocurrencies on future financial crises, I'd like to share my perspective. This issue needs to be viewed from two sides: it could either become a "savior" or a "big problem."

Blockchain and Cryptocurrencies: A Double-Edged Sword

Imagine the 2008 financial crisis, which was triggered by layers of complex, opaque financial products (like subprime mortgages) being bundled. Eventually, the chain broke, and no one knew the true value of what they held, leading to widespread panic.

Now, let's look at how blockchain and cryptocurrencies might change this script.


Pro-View: How They Can Help Us "Prevent" or "Mitigate" Financial Crises?

You can imagine blockchain technology as a "public ledger" that is open to the entire network and cannot be tampered with. Based on this characteristic, it has several potentials:

  1. High Transparency

    • What is it? On the blockchain, every transaction is publicly recorded. While it might be pseudonymous, the flow and total amount of funds can be traced.
    • For example: If those complex financial derivatives back then were built on the blockchain, regulators and investors would have been able to clearly see how much of these "toxic assets" were bundled, to whom they were sold, and how much risk they carried. With everyone having a clear understanding, a systemic panic triggered by information asymmetry would be less likely. Bad debts and risks would have nowhere to hide.
  2. Decentralization

    • What is it? Traditional financial systems heavily rely on centralized institutions, such as large banks and clearinghouses. If a major institution like "Lehman Brothers" collapses, it can trigger a domino effect, potentially paralyzing the entire system.
    • For example: In the world of cryptocurrencies, there is no "central bank." The Bitcoin network is distributed across thousands of computers worldwide, and no single "owner" can shut it down. This distributed structure makes the system more resilient and less prone to complete collapse due to a single point of failure.
  3. Reduced Reliance on Intermediaries, Increased Efficiency

    • What is it? Many financial activities, such as cross-border transfers, require going through a series of banks and intermediaries, making the process slow and costly. Smart contracts on the blockchain can automate these processes.
    • For example: During a crisis, banks might stop lending to each other due to distrust, leading to a market "cash crunch" (liquidity drying up). However, blockchain-based financial systems (DeFi) can operate automatically 24/7, theoretically matching supply and demand for funds more efficiently and avoiding market freezes caused by human factors.

Con-View: How They Could "Trigger" or "Exacerbate" Financial Crises?

Of course, it's not that simple. Cryptocurrencies themselves are a high-risk domain, akin to a "digital wild west," full of new risks.

  1. Extreme Price Volatility

    • What is it? This is the most intuitive risk. Bitcoin's price can surge or plummet by 20% or more in a single day.
    • For example: Imagine if a significant portion of a country's population converted most of their assets into cryptocurrencies, or if many businesses used cryptocurrencies as reserve assets. Should crypto prices crash, people's wealth would instantly evaporate, and businesses could go bankrupt. The ripple effects would be no different from traditional stock market crashes or real estate bubble bursts, and could even be more severe.
  2. Lack of Regulation and Market Manipulation

    • What is it? Global regulation of cryptocurrencies is still very immature, which provides ample opportunities for "whales" (players holding large amounts of tokens), hackers, and scammers.
    • For example: The sudden collapse of a major cryptocurrency exchange due to a hack or internal issues (like FTX), or the de-pegging of a widely used "stablecoin" (like UST), could trigger widespread panic selling. As the crypto market becomes increasingly intertwined with traditional financial markets, such panic could easily spill over into stock and bond markets, leading to a broader crisis.
  3. New Systemic Risks

    • What is it? Previously, the crypto world and traditional finance were two "parallel universes." Now, Wall Street giants (like BlackRock) are issuing Bitcoin ETFs, and banks are starting to offer crypto asset custody services.
    • For example: This means that the risks in the crypto market are no longer isolated. If the crypto market collapses, traditional financial institutions holding significant crypto-related products would also suffer heavy losses. They might be forced to sell off other assets like stocks and bonds to cover their losses, thereby spreading the crisis from the crypto sphere to the entire financial system.

Conclusion

So, what exactly is the impact of blockchain and cryptocurrencies on future financial crises?

  • It's neither a panacea nor a poison; it's more like a potent "new medicine."
  • Used well, its transparency and efficiency truly have the potential to make our financial system healthier and more robust, akin to a "genetic modification" for the system.
  • Used poorly, its high volatility and regulatory vacuum could very well become the "eye" of the next financial storm.

The ultimate direction largely depends on regulatory wisdom. The challenge ahead is how to establish an effective regulatory framework without stifling innovation, to cage this "beast" within institutional boundaries, guiding it to play a positive role while controlling its destructive power.