Critical Thinking

Answer: Absolutely not. You can think of it this way: science and tarot cards are two completely different tools used to solve entirely different problems.

Hello, regarding "fake news," it's indeed a headache-inducing problem. I'll try to share my thoughts in plain language, hoping it can help you.

Haha, that's an excellent question, and it's a dilemma many people face. Let me explain it to you with a real-life example, and you'll grasp it immediately.

Of course, and this can be said to be the most core value of first-principles thinking in learning. Let me give you an analogy, and you'll understand.

Let's put it this way: you can think of these two concepts as two different ways of "deconstruction." Critical thinking is more like "finding flaws" and "quality inspection.

Hello, this is a very interesting question. Using "first principles" might sound profound, but simply put, it's a way of thinking that digs deep into the root cause, like a very curious child constant...

Let's put it this way, it's like learning to cook. If your learning method is to memorize recipes by rote, for example, "Scrambled Eggs with Tomatoes: two eggs, one tomato, 5 grams of salt.

Don't panic, I've got this. Encountering a new question type in an exam feels like you've trained for a 100-meter dash, but the referee suddenly hands you a gun and tells you to shoot.

Hello, this is a very interesting question. I'll try to explain my thoughts in simple terms. You can think of it this way: when we usually learn things and understand the world, it's often like "cooki...

Let's take an analogy. The various subjects we study, such as physics, chemistry, and economics, are like ready-made LEGO models built by others: a car, a house, a spaceship.

Absolutely, you've hit the nail on the head with this question. First principles thinking, in essence, is a habit of "digging to the root" of things.

Great question! This concept might sound abstract, but in practice, it's very down-to-earth. I'll try my best to explain it in plain language.

Hello, this is a very interesting question. I feel many people studying Chinese language arts share this confusion: teachers say "this is well-written," but then explain why it's good in vague, convol...

Absolutely, and one could argue it's one of its most crucial roles. Let me explain with a simple analogy; you might find it easier to understand.

Ah, that's an excellent question. Many people studying history easily get bogged down, feeling as if they're being led by the author. Deconstructing this using "first principles" isn't as mysterious a...

Haha, that's an interesting question. Let me try to share my thoughts in plain language. When we were in school, teachers often used to say: "Memorize this definition; it will be on the exam.

My answer is: I think it can be understood this way: First Principles thinking isn't a specific method like "how to take notes" or "how to memorize vocabulary"; it's more like an "underlying operating...

Hey there, this is an interesting question, and many people feel the same way. Let me try to explain my thoughts in plain language. To put it simply, it's like the difference between a "top student" (...

Absolutely, and this situation is very common in both life and work. Simply put, a "pseudo first principle" is an "assumption" disguised as a "fundamental truth.

我个人觉得，这就像问“是不是所有菜都能用最基础的油盐酱醋和原材料做出来？” 理论上，好像是的。只要你有最基础的食材（鸡、蛋、面粉、番茄）和调味料，你就能组合出无数种菜肴，从炒鸡蛋到法式大餐。这就是“第一性原理”的思路——抛开现有的菜谱（现有的解决方案），去分析食材最本质的特性（物理、化学性质），然后重新组合，创造出新的东西，甚至是颠覆性的东西。