Uncategorized

Okay, let's talk about this topic. Imagine it not as analyzing a company, but as playing with building blocks. We want to construct three models: "low prices," "wide selection," and "fast delivery.

Alright, let's talk about this. This is quite an interesting question. The idea of rocket recovery has been around for a long time, but why has it only been realized recently? It's because the "three ...

Good question, not understanding this can drive one crazy with anxiety. Let's talk about how to use "First Principles" to see it clearly, without any fluff.

Think of it this way: most people starting a business first look at "what sells well." For example, seeing the huge milk tea market, worth hundreds of billions a year, they think, "I'll make milk tea ...

Let's put it this way: you can think of it as two different ways of learning to cook. The first is "analogical thinking," which is how most of us operate.

Of course, and I think this is an "overwhelmingly effective" tool. When we argue, most of the time we're debating "emotions" and "opinions," rather than "facts" and "needs.

I don't think so. They are more like partners than substitutes. Let me use an analogy to help you understand: Evidence-based medicine is like "cooking by following a recipe.

This is an interesting question. If I were to give a direct answer, it would be: In sociology, there isn't a single, universally accepted "first principle" like F=ma in physics or 1+1=2 in mathematics...

In my opinion, these two are fundamentally different things, so it's not about one replacing the other. They are more like two tools with different purposes in a toolbox.

Hey there, this is an interesting question, and many people feel the same way. Let me try to explain my thoughts in plain language. To put it simply, it's like the difference between a "top student" (...

Of course not, these two are more like partners than interchangeable rivals. Let me give you an analogy to help you understand: Socratic questioning is like a skilled detective interrogating a case.

想让孩子学会“第一性原理”这个听起来很牛的思维方式，其实没那么玄乎。说白了，就是教他“扒开洋葱，一层一层看到最里面的核”，而不是只停留在“哦，这是个洋葱”的表面。别把它当成一个课程，把它变成一种生活习惯。 我分享几个自己觉得特别好用的方法，你可以试试： 1. 玩“打破砂锅问到底”的游戏 孩子是天生的“为什么”机器，千万别嫌烦，这是最好的机会。

This is an interesting question, and it's actually not that complicated. Let me share my perspective, hoping it helps you understand. You can imagine yourself as a relentlessly curious child, armed wi...

That's a great question! These two concepts are actually very closely related. I'll try to explain it to you in simple terms. The term "lightweighting" is easy to understand; it means finding every po...

This is an interesting question, and I'll try to explain it to you in plain language. You can imagine first principles thinking as "breaking things down to their fundamentals.

Simply put, herd mentality is about "following the crowd." You see others queuing up to buy something, and you join the queue, regardless of whether you actually need it, always thinking that if so ma...

Here's how you can understand it: Imagine you have an exquisitely built sports car model made of LEGOs in front of you. Most people would see "a sports car.

Hello, this is quite an interesting question, and it's a method we often unconsciously use in our daily lives. To peel back a "conclusion" layer by layer until you see the innermost "fact," my persona...

That's an excellent question, one that immediately hits upon a core contradiction. My understanding is that it depends on how we define "first" in "first principles.

In my opinion, these two are not contradictory at all; instead, they are a perfect match, indispensable to each other. Many people perceive them as conflicting, mainly because they equate "empiricism"...