Is Naval's 'Meditation' Universally Applicable?

Hey, regarding Naval's "meditation" method, that's a really interesting question. I've thought about it and practiced it for a while myself. Let me share my thoughts and hopefully help clarify things for you.

My core point is: The idea of meditation that Naval advocates is universally applicable at its core, but its practice may not suit everyone, especially when starting out.

Let's break it down.

First, we need to clarify what Naval means by "meditation"

When many people hear "meditation," they picture sitting cross-legged, eyes closed, pursuing emptiness or transcendence. But Naval's "meditation" is more like a "mental cleaning technique."

He himself summarized it as "The Art of Doing Nothing."

Simply put, it’s not about "stopping thought," which is almost impossible. The core is:

• Observing your thoughts: You just sit quietly and watch thoughts pop up in your mind, like watching clouds drift in the sky. You don't grab them, push them away, or judge them (e.g., "Ugh, I'm thinking about work again!"). You just watch.
• Realizing you are not your thoughts: When you can observe your thoughts like a bystander, you gradually realize that the brain "thinking" and the "you" that is "observing" are two different things. This realization brings immense freedom.
• Having no goals: There's no "must achieve some state" objective. You sat for 20 minutes today and your mind felt like a chaotic mess? That's fine. You successfully observed that mess for 20 minutes. That is the practice.

Understanding this, we can look at whether it's "universally applicable."

Why is it "universally applicable"? — Its core is simple

In principle, Naval's method is suitable for almost any modern individual seeking greater self-awareness and inner peace.

1. Extremely low barrier to entry: You need zero tools, paid courses, or specific environments. Just a place where you can sit for a short while, even on a bus. This gives it immense universality.
2. Hits the core issue: Much of our suffering and anxiety stems from the "monkey mind" – that incessant inner voice dwelling on the past or worrying about the future. Naval's method directly tackles this problem, which is common to all humans.
3. Builds foundational skills: It cultivates "metacognition" – the awareness of one's own thought processes. This ability is a major asset in work, life, and relationships. It lets you "pause" when emotions run high to first assess the situation clearly.

From this perspective, this "mental exercise" is as universally beneficial as physical exercise.

So, when is it "not applicable"? — Challenges and Misconceptions

While the concept is universal, that doesn't mean the practice is easy for everyone to pick up. That's the crux of the issue.

1. Can be too "free" for beginners: Naval's method offers almost no guidance. For someone new to meditation and feeling particularly restless, the instruction "sit, do nothing" may actually increase anxiety and frustration. Many try for a few minutes and quit because they don't know what "success" feels like, easily thinking, "I'm doing it wrong" or "This doesn't work."
2. It's "counterintuitive": Our brains are wired to think, solve problems, and seek dopamine rewards. This meditation requires "non-action" (wu wei), which is inherently a significant challenge. It might be the simplest and also the hardest form of meditation. Therefore, it's normal many can't stick with it.
3. Easily mistaken for "lying flat" or passivity: Some might misinterpret this meditation as thinking nothing and doing nothing. Quite the opposite: it aims to use brief "non-action" to make you more focused and clear-headed when you are active.
4. Not suitable for those with severe psychological trauma or disorders: If you are experiencing significant depression, anxiety disorders, or PTSD, unguided introspection like this can sometimes amplify negative emotions or even trigger more severe issues. In such cases, seeking professional therapy (like Cognitive Behavioral Therapy) or practicing mindfulness under an experienced teacher is a more responsible choice.

---

Summary: How to tell if it's right for you?

So, back to the original question: Is Naval's "meditation" universally applicable?

It could be said that it's a "mental operating system" that everyone can try and potentially benefit from. But it’s not a plug-and-play app; it's more like a programming language that requires patient learning and fine-tuning.

My advice for you:

• Treat it as an experiment: Don't start with the grand goal of "achieving liberation." Just view it as a small experiment lasting 5-10 minutes a day.
• Lower your expectations: Today's goal is simply "sitting down." It doesn't matter if your mind is a chaotic mess. If you sat down, today's practice is complete.
• If it feels too hard, start with guided meditation: Try apps like Headspace or Calm for guided meditations. They use voice instructions to guide your attention to your breath, bodily sensations, etc., acting like "training wheels" to make it easier to start. Once you're accustomed to the feeling of "quieting down," trying Naval's "non-action" style meditation might go much smoother.

Ultimately, it's more of a philosophical attitude: Learning to peacefully coexist with your restless mind. This journey, I believe, is worth a try for anyone.