Cryptocurrency

That's an excellent question, and one many people have. I'll try to explain it in simple terms; it's quite fascinating. You can think of Bitcoin and the dot-com bubble as the same play, just with a di...

Okay, let's talk about this. Imagine Weimar Germany, where people had to push a wheelbarrow full of cash just to buy a loaf of bread. Or Zimbabwe, even more extreme, printing 100 trillion dollar bankn...

This is an interesting question, and I think the answer is: largely yes, but not entirely. It might sound a bit convoluted, so let me break it down for you.

This is a particularly interesting question. I think if we view the evolution of money as the history of transportation development, then Bitcoin is currently in the stage where "the first automobile ...

That's a very interesting and pertinent question. My answer is: Yes, and this trend is very evident. Imagine it like supporting a sports team or being a fan of a celebrity.

Hello, that's a great question. Actually, it's not that complicated; let me give you a few analogies to make it clear. You can imagine the Bitcoin market as a giant, highly emotionally sensitive "popu...

Hello, regarding this question, I'll try to share my thoughts with you in plain language. This topic is actually quite interesting, much like how we view an antique or a painting – some consider it pr...

I think 'utopian value experiment' is a rather fitting description for Bitcoin, especially when looking back at its inception. Why "Utopian"? Imagine this: before Bitcoin, all our money had to be mana...

You've hit on a crucial point. If we view the underlying logic of value as "consensus" or "belief," then many things suddenly become clear. From this perspective, Bitcoin, religion, and gold indeed sh...

This is an excellent question, as it directly addresses Bitcoin's biggest current point of contention. There isn't a simple 'yes' or 'no' answer; it's more about what you prioritize.

从某些角度看，确实是这样。你可以把比特币想象成一种为了“金融自由”而进行的技术实验，它从设计上就试图挑战传统的、中心化的金融权威。 要理解这一点，可以从下面几个方面来看： 1. 你的钱，完全属于你 在传统的银行体系里，你的钱其实是存在银行的数据库里。银行、政府或某些机构在特定情况下（比如法律纠纷、政策变动）可以冻结、划走甚至没收你的存款。你只是“相信”银行会让你随时取用。 比特币不一样。

Of course not. You can understand it this way: scarcity is only a "necessary condition" for value, but not a "sufficient condition." If something is merely scarce but has no use or consensus, it won't...

This is an interesting question, and the answer is: it can both amplify and weaken its borderless nature. It's like a double-edged sword, and the specific outcome depends on the type of political risk...

Let's put it this way, this matter is actually quite easy to understand. You can imagine a country's sovereign currency (like the RMB or US dollar) as "stock" or "shopping vouchers" issued by a super-...

Hello! This is actually a very interesting question, and I'll try to explain it to you in simple terms. You can imagine Bitcoin as a global "internet celebrity," and each country's regulatory policies...

It depends on the location, but in most countries, it is not considered "legal tender." First, we need to understand a term: "Legal Tender." Simply put, "legal tender" is a form of payment that a coun...

This is quite an interesting topic to discuss, almost like something out of a sci-fi movie, but it's indeed a serious concern that people are actively considering.

Yes, absolutely, and it's fair to say that without technologies like the Lightning Network, Bitcoin would struggle to be truly "usable." Let me give you an analogy, and it will become clear.

To put it this way, Bitcoin is like digital gold, while Ethereum is more like a world computer. Bitcoin's core value lies in "simplicity" and "reliability.

This is an excellent question because it touches upon one of Bitcoin's most fundamental and paradoxical aspects. I'll try to explain it in simple terms.