Thinking and Decision-Making

That's a great question, and it's one many people have asked. Simply put, Tarot cards won't give you a direct "yes, change" or "no, don't change" answer.

Of course, but Tarot cards might not give you a direct color answer, like "you should dye your hair green." It's more like a tool to help you explore your inner thoughts.

Of course, using Tarot cards to analyze offers can be quite helpful when you're struggling to make a choice. However, you need to understand one thing first: Tarot cards won't directly tell you "go to...

Certainly, but it might not be what you expect. Let's put it this way: Tarot cards won't give you a simple "should I change" or "shouldn't I change" answer.

Of course, this is actually a very interesting way to use them! However, Tarot cards won't tell you directly, like a food app, "Restaurant A is better than Restaurant B.

当然可以，很多人都这么做过。不过，这里面有个小小的“使用说明”需要了解一下。 塔罗牌不是一个能直接告诉你“行”或“不行”的神奇按钮。你如果直接问“我该不该向他/她表白？”，牌面可能会让你很困惑。 把它想象成一个帮你分析情况的“情感参谋”会更准确。它更擅长帮你梳理你自己的内心，以及看清当前的局势。

Answer: Absolutely not. You can think of it this way: science and tarot cards are two completely different tools used to solve entirely different problems.

It's like asking: if someone offers a high price for the child you painstakingly raised, would you sell? The answer isn't that simple; it depends on why you "gave birth" to this child in the first pla...

Buddy, we need to think this through carefully, don't be impulsive. Signing a three-year contract is a bit like renting an office for three years – it has its pros and cons.

Man, I totally get it. It's exactly like when I go home for Chinese New Year, and my mom asks me, "What exactly are you typing on that computer that makes you money?" Explaining "how you make money" t...

This is a classic question that almost everyone with a technical background asks themselves in the dead of night when building their own product.

Hello, regarding "fake news," it's indeed a headache-inducing problem. I'll try to share my thoughts in plain language, hoping it can help you.

Let's take an analogy: imagine you want to build a house. This is your "long-term learning plan." How do most people go about it? They look at their neighbors' houses, what interior design styles are ...

很有意思的问题，用“第一性原理”来思考学习时间分配，其实就是把所有别人告诉你的、或者你默认以为“应该如此”的条条框框都扔掉，回到最根本、最原始的点，然后从这些点出发，重新搭建只属于你自己的方法。 这就像盖房子，你不是去参考邻居家怎么盖（类比思维），而是从“我要一个什么样的家？家里几口人？我有什么样的生活习惯？这块地皮的地基和朝向如何？”这些最本质的需求和条件出发，来设计你的房子。

Haha, that's an excellent question, and it's a dilemma many people face. Let me explain it to you with a real-life example, and you'll grasp it immediately.

Alright, let's talk about this. Trying to understand why we procrastinate using "first principles" isn't as mysterious as it sounds. Simply put, it's like a child who keeps asking "why" until they get...

That's a fascinating question. Let's try using the "First Principles" tool, peeling back the question "Why do we learn?" layer by layer, like an onion, to see what truly lies at its core.

Of course, and this can be said to be the most core value of first-principles thinking in learning. Let me give you an analogy, and you'll understand.

Let's put it this way: you can think of these two concepts as two different ways of "deconstruction." Critical thinking is more like "finding flaws" and "quality inspection.

Hello, this is a very interesting question. Using "first principles" might sound profound, but simply put, it's a way of thinking that digs deep into the root cause, like a very curious child constant...